𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On cyclic Meir–Keeler contractions in metric spaces

✍ Scribed by Bożena Piątek

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
212 KB
Volume
74
Category
Article
ISSN
0362-546X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions are considered under the recently introduced WUC and HW properties on pairs of subsets of metric spaces. We show that, in contrast with previous results in the theory, best proximity point theorems under these properties do not directly extend from cyclic contractions to cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions. We obtain, however, a positive result for cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions under additional properties which is shown to be an extension of already existing results for cyclic contractions. Moreover, we give examples supporting the necessity of our additional conditions.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Meir–Keeler-type conditions in abstract
Meir–Keeler-type conditions in abstract metric spaces
✍ Zoran Kadelburg; Stojan Radenović 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB

Various Meir-Keeler-type conditions for mappings acting in abstract metric spaces are presented and their connections are discussed. Results about associated symmetric spaces, obtained in [S. Radenović, Z. Kadelburg, Quasi-contractions on symmetric and cone symmetric spaces, Banach J. Math. Anal. 5

Best proximity points for cyclic Meir–Ke
Best proximity points for cyclic Meir–Keeler contractions
✍ Cristina Di Bari; Tomonari Suzuki; Calogero Vetro 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 338 KB

We introduce a notion of cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions and prove a theorem which assures the existence and uniqueness of a best proximity point for cyclic Meir-Keeler contractions. This theorem is a generalization of a recent result due to Eldred and Veeramani.

On characterizations of Meir–Keeler cont
On characterizations of Meir–Keeler contractive maps
✍ Teck-Cheong Lim 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

Let (X; d) be a complete metric space and T : X → X a map. Suppose there exists a function : R + → R + satisfying (0) = 0; (s) ¡ s for s ¿ 0 and that is right upper semicontinuous such that d(Tx; Ty) ≤ (d(x; y)) ∀x; y ∈ X: