𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

On comparing competing structural models of PTSD: Comments on Miller et al.*

✍ Scribed by Leonard J. Simms


Publisher
Springer
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
55 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-9867

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In this commentary, the author evaluates the results and conclusions of Miller et al. (2010) with respect to the debate surrounding the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) structural models of King, Leskin, King, and Weathers (1998) and Simms, Watson, and Doebbeling (2002). Although Miller et al. are to be commended for attempting to move this literature forward through a comparative assessment of the models' respective convergent and discriminant validities, the author questions their conclusions based on the data presented. His read of their data, in the context of the broader literature, is that the Simms model has advantages over the King model with respect to discriminant validity. It is premature to declare a winner in the ongoing debate on the merits of these structural models.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On comparing competing models of PTSD: R
✍ Mark W. Miller πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 60 KB

## Abstract This is a response to Simms' commentary on Miller, Wolf, Harrington, Brown, Kaloupek, and Keane (2010) comparing the convergent and discriminant validity of two 4‐factor models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) using external measures of comorbidity. The author reviews the importa

Does oral glucosamine prevent subchondra
✍ Santos CastaΓ±eda; Raquel Largo; Emilio Calvo; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 32 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In the recent study by Wang et al (1), the authors concluded that after anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT), changes in subchondral bone begin early and simultaneously with cartilage degradation and that oral glucosamine hydrochloride has a protective effect (1). They based this conclusion