๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Office vs. urodynamic flows: Is there a difference?

โœ Scribed by R. E. Reid; L. Maliver; E. Laor; B. M. Tolia; S. Z. Freed


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
218 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0733-2467

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In order to evaluate the possible effect environment might have upon a patient's flow pattern, a study was conducted of 50 patients (23 males and 27 females), who first voided in the privacy of an office and for whom a repeat flow measurement was later obtained in the urodynamic setting. An analysis of covariance was used to compare maximum flow rates in both areas. Male patients voided with a significantly lower maximum flow rate in the urodynamic laboratory. A calculated correction factor was derived for men (1.62), which would bring the maximum flow in the urodynamic laboratory up to the flow measurements in the office. It appears that environment does play a significant role upon the voiding parameters of men under testing situations.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Yielding: giants versus minnows, is ther
โœ David A. Edgar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 315 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The paper explores differences between small and large hotel group yield management (YM) strategies. The ยฎndings indicate clear variances in YM approach and perspectives. Core differences revolve around the orientation of the YM process, with small hotels focusing on cost management as opposed to th