The Oecd Development Assistance Committee (Dac) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of Dac members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. Dac peer reviews assess the performance of a given memb
OECD development co-operation peer reviews. Belgium 2015.
โ Scribed by OECD
- Publisher
- OECD
- Year
- 2015
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 110
- Series
- OECD development co-operation peer reviews.
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Annotation
This review of the development co-operation efforts of Belgium examines its policies, performance and implementation. It takes an integrated, system-wide perspective on the development co-operation and humanitarian assistance activities of the member unde.
โฆ Table of Contents
Conducting the peer review --
Abbreviations and acronyms --
Belgium's aid at a glance --
Context of Belgium's peer review --
The DAC's main findings and recommendations --
Towards a comprehensive Belgian development effort --
Belgium's vision and policies for development co-operation --
Allocating Belgium's official development assistance --
Managing Belgium's development co-operation --
Belgium's development co-operation delivery and partnerships --
Results-based management, learning and accountability in the Belgian programme --
Belgium's humanitarian assistance --
Progress since the 2010 DAC peerreview recommendations --
OECD/DAC standard suite of tables --
Field visit to Rwanda --
Organisational structure.
โฆ Subjects
Economic assistance, Belgian;International cooperation
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The Oecd's Development Assistance Committee (Dac) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of Dac members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years.</p> This review assesses the performance of Poland, n
The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts periodic reviews of the individual development co-operation efforts of DAC members. The policies and programmes of each member are critically examined approximately once every five years. DAC peer reviews assess the performance of a given me
Norway's commitment to spend 1% of gross national income on official development assistance is supported across the political spectrum. It increasingly uses multilateral channels to promote global public goods and address global challenges. This review looks at the changes to systems, structures and