I wish to bring to your attention an error in our recently published manuscript (1989), "Lung cancer in motor exhaust-related occupations." In the abstract "0.9 (95% CI = 0.6-1.2) for those with possible exposure to other recognized or reported lung carcinogens" should read as " 1.2 (95% CI = 0.7-2.
Occupational lung cancer in US women, 1984–1998
✍ Scribed by Cynthia F. Robinson; Patricia A. Sullivan; Jia Li; James T. Walker
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 304 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0271-3586
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in US women, accounting for 72,130 deaths in 2006. In addition to smoking cessation, further reduction of the burden of lung cancer mortality can be made by preventing exposure to occupational lung carcinogens. Data for occupational exposures and health outcomes of US working women are limited. Methods Population-based mortality data for 4,570,711 women who died between 1984 and 1998 in 27 US States were used to evaluate lung cancer proportionate mortality over time by the usual occupation and industry reported on death certificates. Lung cancer proportionate mortality ratios were adjusted for smoking, using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II. Results Analyses revealed that 194,382 white, 18,225 Black and 1,515 Hispanic women died 1984-1998 with lung cancer reported as the underlying cause of death. Following adjustment for smoking, significant excess proportionate lung cancer mortality was observed among US women working in the US manufacturing; transportation; retail trade; agriculture, forestry, and fishing; and nursing/personal care industries. Women employed in precision production, technical, managerial, professional specialty, and administrative occupations experienced some of the highest significantly excess proportionate lung cancer mortality during 1984 -1998. Conclusions . Conclusions The results of our study point to significantly elevated risks for lung cancer after adjustment for smoking among women in several occupations and industries. Because 6-17% of lung cancer in US males is attributable to known exposures to occupational carcinogens, and since synergistic interactions between cigarette smoke and other occupational lung carcinogens have been noted, it is important to continue research into the effects of occupational exposures on working men and women.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: The etiology of breast cancer is not fully understood. environmental and occupational exposures may contribute to breast cancer risk. ## Methods: We linked 324 job titles from the 1970 census of 892,591 finnish women with incidence of breast cancer (23,638 cases) during 1971-1995.
## Background: Health care workers are potentially exposed to a number of carcinogens. studies among women in this field have focused on white nurses; however, workers in many health care occupations share exposures experienced by nurses. ## Methods: Cancer mortality was examined among female hea
## Background: To investigate the association between lung cancer and occupational factors in women. ## Methods: Six hundred eighty-six women with lung cancer and 712 controls matched for age and region were interviewed to gather occupational histories and information about other risk factors and