𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Obsessive-compulsive disorder with predominantly scrupulous symptoms: clinical and religious characteristics

✍ Scribed by Jedidiah Siev; Lee Baer; William E. Minichiello


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
123 KB
Volume
67
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives: Scrupulosity is a relatively common but understudied subtype of obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) characterized by religious or moral fears. It is difficult to treat and frequently disabling. We examined scrupulosity as it relates to (a) treatment‐seeking behavior and perceived treatment gains, (b) the perceived effect of symptoms on religious experience, and (c) conceptions of God. Method: Seventy‐two individuals with scrupulous OCD (mean age = 36; 70% women) and 75 individuals with nonscrupulous OCD (mean age = 38; 81% women) completed an internet‐based survey. Results: The groups did not differ on demographic variables or overall OCD severity. Compared with the nonscrupulous group, the scrupulous group was (a) more religious, (b) more likely to seek pastoral counseling, (c) less likely to seek medication treatment, and (d) more likely to report that symptoms interfered with their religious experience. Indeed, most scrupulous individuals endorsed that their symptoms interfered with their religious experience. Scrupulous individuals with a more negative concept of God experienced more severe symptoms, whereas a positive description of God was unrelated to severity of scrupulosity in this group. Nearly one in five scrupulous participants reported no religious affiliation. Conclusions: Scrupulous individuals have unique treatment‐seeking preferences. Moreover, most scrupulous individuals perceive their symptoms as interfering with their religious experience. Focusing on the religious costs and benefits of scrupulous rituals might have clinical utility. Finally, scrupulous individuals with a more negative concept of God experienced more severe symptoms. Future research is necessary to evaluate whether addressing such concepts can improve treatment outcome. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 67:1–9, 2011.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Clinical characteristics of inpatient ad
✍ Gal Shoval; Gil Zalsman; Leo Sher; Alan Apter; Abraham Weizman 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB 👁 1 views

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common disorder in adolescents, usually treated in the outpatient setting. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of adolescents with severe OCD that required hospitalization. A total of 342 patients consecutively admitted to a psy

Demographic and clinical characteristics
✍ Bernadette Cullen; Jack F. Samuels; Anthony Pinto; Abby J. Fyer; James T. McCrac 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB 👁 1 views

This study investigated the demographic and clinical factors that influence treatment status in family members with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Six hundred and two subjects from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) t

Prevalence and clinical characteristics
✍ Nicholas J. Sibrava; Christina L. Boisseau; Maria C. Mancebo; Jane L. Eisen; Ste 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB 👁 2 views

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and debilitating anxiety disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life and functioning. Research examining the differences in clinical correlates and treatment response associated with different obsessions in OCD has y

Clinical outcome in patients with bipola
✍ Franca Centorrino; John Hennen; Gopinath Mallya; Samy Egli; Tim Clark; Ross J. B 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Bipolar disorder (BPD) is often comorbid with obsessive‐compulsive (OCD) and other anxiety disorders, but the impact of such comorbidity on long‐term outcome has not been evaluated systematically. ## Methods Extensive follow‐up assessments were carried out at 4.3 years