✦ LIBER ✦

Oblateness of the Sun in 1983 and relativity

✍ Scribed by Dicke, R. H.; Kuhn, J. R.; Libbrecht, K. G.

Book ID: 109739995
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 424 KB
Volume: 316
Category: Article
ISSN: 0028-0836
DOI: 10.1038/316687a0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Implications of the Oblateness of the Su

Implications of the Oblateness of the Sun

✍ ROXBURGH, IAN W. 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 239 KB

On the theory of the oblateness of the S

On the theory of the oblateness of the Sun

✍ J.P. Rozelot; S. Godier; S. Lefebvre 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 258 KB

The Sun's Rotation and Relativity

✍ DICKE, R. H. 📂 Article 📅 1964 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 500 KB

Relative population of the oblate and pr

Relative population of the oblate and prolate structures in187Au

✍ A. Korichi; N. Perrin; C. Bourgeois; D. Hojman; D. G. Popescu; H. Sergolle; F. H 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 400 KB

Relative population of oblate and prolat

Relative population of oblate and prolate structures in189Au

✍ N. Perrin; A. Korichi; C. Bourgeois; F. Azaiez; J. Duprat; F. Ibrahim; D. Hojman 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 473 KB

An estimation of the oblateness of Sun f

An estimation of the oblateness of Sun from the motion of Icarus

✍ W. Landgraf 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 382 KB

From astrometric observations of minor planet (1566) Icarus from 1949 to 1987 were made solutions for improved orbital elements of Icarus and the quadrupole moment of the Sun. The formal result was J2 = -0.6 i 5.8 9 10 -6. From this we can conclude that J2 is very probably less than 2 9 10 -5.