๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Numerical approximation of the three-dimensional ocean primitive equations

โœ Scribed by Daniel X. Guo


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
334 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0749-159X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

In this article, we investigate the numerical approximation of the threeโ€dimensional ocean primitive equations (PEs), which was studied by Lions et al. We develop a new scheme for the PEs based on the fractionalโ€step method approximation, which is of second order (and can possibly be made of higher order) in time and reduces the core computation to a twoโ€dimensional problem. For the testing of the scheme, the numerical simulation for the ocean on a rectangular domain is presented. We focus on the ocean surface and study the nonlinear behavior of western boundary currents (WBCs), with particular emphasis on multiple equilibriaโ€”the soโ€called doubleโ€gyre phenomena. The wind stress on the ocean surface is the only force. The basic state of the ocean surface consists of two antisymmetric gyres when the wind stress is symmetric. By applying the scheme to the PEs, we are able to investigate most aspects of the ocean circulation. We will report them elsewhere. ยฉ 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq, 2006


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Symbolic derivation of finite difference
โœ Murli M. Gupta; Jules Kouatchou ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 307 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

A symbolic procedure for deriving various finite difference approximations for the three-dimensional Poisson equation is described. Based on the software package Mathematica, we utilize for the formulation local solutions of the differential equation and obtain the standard second-order scheme (7-po

Three-dimensional inverse-scattering num
โœ S. Caorsi; G. L. Gragnani; M. Pastorino ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 156 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Figure 4 Magnitude of reflection coefficient versus frf for three different designs; that is, three choices of s and s . f is the 0 1 2 0 design zero-reflection frequency An obvious extension of this work is to consider oblique incidence, in which case matching is required for both TEand TM-polariz