𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Note on a method of estimating the prandtl number of liquids

✍ Scribed by Denbigh, K. G.


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
1946
Weight
257 KB
Volume
65
Category
Article
ISSN
0368-4075

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Ono of the dimensioluss numbers which outers into the theory of heat transfer in fluids is the Prandtl number. This is defined by the relation: where p is the specific heat at constant pressure, Ξ· is the viscosity and ΞΊ is the thermal conductivity of the fluid. In the case of gases a theorem of the kinetic theory shows that the modified Prandtl number, cvΞ·/k, should be the same for all monatomie gases, and should have a numerical value of 0Β·4 independent of temperature. Actual values of this quantity lie between 0Β·4 and 0Β·6 for almost all gases, including those which are not monatomie. The true Prandtl number, cvΞ·/k, is also nearly constant, and for almost all gases the values lie between 0Β·7 and 1Β·0. Among liquids, however, the values of the Prandtl number vary over a range from 3 to over 10,000. Unfortunately, reliable experimental data on cp, Ξ· and ΞΊ is available for only a small number of liquids, and this limits the extent to which equations, such as that of Dittus and Boeltor, can be used for the calculation of the film cooficient of heat transfer in liquids. During some work on industrial heat transfer the writer has examined the possibility of relating the Prandtl number with some other physical property whose value is much more generally known.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A note on the bichromatic numbers of gra
✍ Dennis D. A. Epple; Jing Huang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 90 KB πŸ‘ 1 views
A note on the axiomatisation of real num
✍ Thierry Coquand; L. Henri Lombardi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 86 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Is it possible to give an abstract characterisation of constructive real numbers? A condition should be that all axioms are valid for Dedekind reals in any topos, or for constructive reals in Bishop mathematics. We present here a possible first‐order axiomatisation of real numbers, whic