𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Not guilty by reason of insanity evaluations: A study of defendants and examiners

✍ Scribed by Dorothy Mack; Laura Weinland


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
581 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0047-2352

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Guilty by Reason of Insanity: Why the De
✍ Democratic Party (U.S.);Limbaugh, David πŸ“‚ Fiction πŸ“… 2019 πŸ› Regnery Publishing 🌐 en-US βš– 376 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

**"Todays Democrats are pushing policies that are simply insane, and David Limbaugh proves it in his terriffic, and tremendously important, new book, *Guilty by Reason of Insanity*." MARK LEVIN** **"Few pundits can match David Limbaugh for research, depth of knowledge, and political insight, an

The Utility of the SASSI-3 in Early Dete
✍ Ervin E. Wright II; Nick J. Piazza; John M. Laux πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 98 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Previous studies have shown the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory‐3 (G. Miller, 1999) to be valid in classifying substance use disorders in forensic and mentally ill populations. The authors found that it also correctly classified substance use disorders in the understudied not guilty by re

The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a r
✍ Richard Rogers; Kenneth W. Sewell πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Insanity evaluations are characterized by continued professional debate and the paucity of empirical research. To address the latter, the construct validity of the Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS; Rogers, 1984) was examined via an extensive re-analysis of 413 insanity cases.