Not all realcompact spaces are ultrapure
β Scribed by Howard Wicke
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 269 KB
- Volume
- 91
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0166-8641
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A general theorem (Theorem 1) concerning when spaces are not ultrapure in the sense of Arhangel'skii is proved. Arhangel'skii, in conversation, asked whether realcompactness implies his concept of ultrapurity and whether there are ZFC examples of astral spaces which are not ultrapure. TodorEevE in (1984, Theorem 0.6) describes a class of spaces all of whose members are hereditarily realcompact. These spaces satisfy the hypothesis of Theorem 1 and are thus not ultrapure. Since some of these spaces are ZFC examples this answers both questions. These spaces and Theorem 1 are also applied, using an idea of Sakai (1986), to produce ZFC examples of spaces which are neat in Sakai's sense but not pure in the sense of Arhangel'skii. Sakai (1986) has a CH example of such a space.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
De Groojt and 'Verbeek have both asked for an example of a compact Hausdorff space which is not supercompact. It is shown here that if X is nor pseudocompact! then fiX is not supercompact. It is done in the more general setting of Wallman compactificatiom!~.
**The international bestseller and winner of the Campiello Prize for Literatureβ"Moving and lyrical writing . . . Belongs in the canon of great war fiction" (*Paste Magazine*).** Andrea Molesini's exquisite debut novel portrays the depths of heroism and horror within a Northern Italian villag