๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Normative decision making with multiattribute performance targets

โœ Scribed by Ali E. Abbas; James E. Matheson


Book ID
102499769
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
437 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9214

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Many companies set multiple performance targets for their managers and reward them on meeting a threshold value for each target or goal. Examples of such incentive structures abide in the managerial literature and in organizational settings. We show that this incentive structure, while popular, has two main problems: (i) it can induce managers who try to maximize the probability of meeting their performance targets to make decisions that are not compatible with expected utility maximizing decisions, and (ii) it may lead to tradeโ€offs among the performance objectives that are inconsistent with the corporate value function. In this paper, we propose a method to remedy these two problems, while retaining a targetโ€based incentive scheme. We define a multiattribute target as a deterministic region in the space of multiattribute outcomes that has two properties: (1) the probability that the outcome of a multiattribute lottery lies within the target region is equal to the expected utility of the lottery, and (2) all outcomes within the target region are preferred to all outcomes outside it. These two properties lead to a new quantity; which we call the โ€˜value aspiration equivalentโ€™ that leads managers who maximize the probability of meeting their targets to simultaneously maximize the expected utility, and it also induces tradeโ€offs that are consistent with the decision maker's value function. Copyright ยฉ 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Normative target-based decision making
โœ Ali E. Abbas; James E. Matheson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 213 KB

## Abstract This paper relates normative expectedโ€utility decision making to targetโ€based decision making, and introduces a new quantity, the aspiration equivalent. We show that using the aspiration equivalent as a target provides a new method for choosing between lotteries that is consistent with