Nonvolumetric assessment of ventricular function by two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease
โ Scribed by Peder M. Shea; Matthew U. Glover; Jeffrey B. Handler; Dennis P. Nelson; W. V. R. Vieweg
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 525 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0091-2751
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was prospectively predicted by non- volumetric parameters obtained by M-mode and two-dimensional (2DE) echocardiography in 55 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. In particular, the mitral E-point to septum separation (EPSS) could predict the angiographic ejection fraction (EF) according to the formula %EF = 74 -2 (EPSS) with a correlation of 0.81 and a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 12%. An EPSS of greater than 10 mm predicted ventricular dysfunction with a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.93. A Wall Motion Score (WMS), obtained by summing segmental wall motion assessed as normal = 4, hypokinetic = 3, akinetic = 2, dyskinetic = 1, for each of seven segments and dividing by seven (the number of segments evaluated), aIso correlated with the angiographic EF (r = .76). An abnormal WMS was found to be less than 3.3 and together with an EPSS greater than 10 mm, these parameters had a sensitivity of 0.90, a specificity of 0.92, and predictive value of 0.90 for ventricular dysfunction, as evidenced by an EF of less than 0.51. We conclude that the EPSS has as great a predictive value for the EF as the more vigorous quantitative volumetric echocardiographic estimates. Together with the WMS, these parameters are of considerable clinical value in detecting ventricular dysfunction. Indexing Words: Ventricular function * 2D Echo * Coronary disease * Segmental wall motion abnormality
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In the assessment of the acute results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), myocardial perfusion at maximal vasodilatation theoretically has fewer limitations than the coronary flow reserve measurements and quantitative coronary angiography. The purpose of this study was to comp