Noninvasive estimation of hepatic steatosis using plain CT vs. Chemical-shift MR imaging: Significance for living donors
✍ Scribed by Kengo Yoshimitsu; Yousuke Kuroda; Makoto Nakamuta; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroyuki Irie; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Masakazu Hirakawa; Kousei Ishigami; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Tomomi Yamada; Hiroshi Honda
- Book ID
- 102374397
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 180 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To compare plain computed tomography (CT) and chemical‐shift MR imaging (CSI) for establishing a noninvasive method to estimate the degree of steatosis.
Materials and Methods
A total of 58 patients who had histological proof of liver tissue and underwent CT and/or CSI within two weeks, were studied. They consisted of 38 living donor candidates and 20 liver surgery patients without hepatitis or cirrhosis. The CT index (CTI) and MR index (MRI) were defined and correlated to histological grades of steatosis. Correlation was also performed exclusively for mild steatosis (grades 0–2).
Results
Both plain CT (ρ = 0.74, P < 0.0001) and CSI (ρ = 0.83, P < 0.0001) had good correlation with histological grades of steatosis, showing no significant difference between them. For mild steatosis, CSI (ρ = 0.77, P < 0.0001) had better correlation than CT (ρ = 0.49, P = 0.001) (P = 0.049). Accuracy in differentiation between grade 0–1 vs. grade 2–4 steatosis was 85% using a CTI >6, and 91% using an MRI <0.03 as criteria. That between grade 0–2 and grade 3–4 was 91% using a CTI >–8 and 88% using an MRI <0.25 as criteria.
Conclusion
Both plain CT and CSI were useful in estimating the degree of steatosis but CSI was superior to CT in differentiating mild steatosis. These indices may at least partially replace percutaneous biopsy in evaluating grades of steatosis for living donors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:678–684. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES