## Abstract ## Purpose To assess the quality of a navigator‐gated, free breathing, steady‐state free precession (SSFP) technique in comparison to a single breathhold for pulmonary artery imaging in normal volunteers. ## Materials and Methods Sagittal sections of the left pulmonary arteries of 10
Non–contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta using cardiac and navigator-gated magnetization-prepared three-dimensional steady-state free precession
✍ Scribed by Yasuo Amano; Katsuya Takahama; Shinichiro Kumita
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 304 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the usefulness of non–contrast‐enhanced MR angiography using cardiac and navigator‐gated magnetization‐prepared three‐dimensional (3D) steady‐state free precession (SSFP) imaging for the diagnosis of diseases of the thoracic aorta.
Materials and Methods
Twenty‐two patients with diseases of the thoracic aorta were examined using a 1.5 Tesla unit. Non–contrast‐enhanced MR angiography was done using parasagittal 3D SSFP combined with cardiac‐gating and k‐space weighted navigator‐gating techniques, using T2‐prepared and fat‐suppression pulses. Imaging quality and the diagnostic capability of this technique were compared with the imaging quality of 2D SSFP or contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography and with final diagnoses.
Results
Non–contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography provided signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios of the thoracic aorta comparable to non–contrast‐enhanced 2D or contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography (P > 0.17). This imaging technique gave accurate diagnoses in 19 of the 22 patients.
Conclusion
Non–contrast‐enhanced MR angiography using cardiac and navigator‐gated magnetization‐prepared 3D SSFP technique was useful for the diagnosis of diseases of the thoracic aorta. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare nongated three‐dimensional (3D) contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA) with 3D‐navigated cardiac‐gated steady‐state free‐precession bright blood (3D‐nav SSFP) and noncontrast 2D techniques for ascending aorta dimension measurements. ## Materia