✦ LIBER ✦

Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology

✍ Scribed by D. E. Pearson; K. S. McKelvey; L. F. Ruggiero

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 109 KB
Volume: 122
Category: Article
ISSN: 0029-8549
DOI: 10.1007/pl00008828

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Non-target effects of bacterial biologic

Non-target effects of bacterial biological control agents on soil Protozoa

✍ Karen Stevnbak Andersen; Anne Winding 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB

Non-target effects of bacterial biologic

Non-target effects of bacterial biological control agents suppressing root pathogenic fungi

✍ Anne Winding; Svend J. Binnerup; Hap Pritchard 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 259 KB

Microorganisms have knowingly been used during the last century to control plant diseases. During the last decades, research and application of biological control agents (BCAs) as a pest control strategy have gained increasing attention. This review focuses specifically on non-target effects of bact

The suitability of non-target native man

The suitability of non-target native mangroves for the survival and development of the lantana bugAconophora compressa, an introduced weed biological control agent

✍ E. L. Snow; K. Dhileepan 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

Methods Used to Assess Non-target Effect

Methods Used to Assess Non-target Effects of Invertebrate Biological Control Agents of Arthropod Pests

✍ Dirk Babendreier; Franz Bigler; Ulrich Kuhlmann 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 322 KB

Potential exposure of a classical biolog

Potential exposure of a classical biological control agent of the soybean aphid,Aphis glycines, on non-target aphids in North America

✍ Kris A. G. Wyckhuys; Robert L. Koch; Robert R. Kula; George E. Heimpel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 543 KB