𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

No evidence of association between anti–tumor necrosis factor treatment and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

✍ Scribed by Mark Lunt; Kath D. Watson; William G. Dixon; British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register Control Centre Consortium; Deborah P. M. Symmons; Kimme L. Hyrich; British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
100 KB
Volume
62
Category
Article
ISSN
0004-3591

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Objective

To study the association between anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and mortality in a national cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

We prospectively followed up 12,672 patients who were beginning anti-TNF therapy and 3,522 biologic-naive patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) until either July 31, 2008, or death, whichever occurred first. Notification of death and cause of death was received from the UK National Death Register. Mortality was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for the confounding effects of baseline differences between groups, including age, sex, disease severity, disability, and comorbidity. Missing baseline data were accounted for using multiple imputation.

Results

When compared with the DMARD cohort, the anti-TNF cohort was younger (median age 57 years versus 61 years), had greater disease activity (median Disease Activity Score in 28 joints 6.6 versus 5.1), and had greater disability (median Health Assessment Questionnaire score 2.1 versus 1.6). Patients in the DMARD cohort were more likely to have a history of myocardial infarction (4.8% versus 3.1%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.1% versus 4.8%) but were less likely to have had depression (16.5% versus 18.9%). There were 9,445 and 50,803 person-years of followup in the DMARD and anti-TNF cohorts, respectively, during which time 204 DMARD-treated and 856 anti-TNF–treated patients died. The weighted mortality hazard ratios in the anti-TNF cohort were as follows: all-cause 0.86 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.64–1.16), circulatory disease 0.73 (95% CI 0.44–1.23), neoplasm 0.65 (95% CI 0.39–1.09), and respiratory disease 0.81 (95% CI 0.36–1.83).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that, compared with standard DMARD therapy, treatment with anti-TNF therapies was not associated with an increase in mortality.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Outcomes after switching from one anti–t
✍ Kimme L. Hyrich; Mark Lunt; Kath D. Watson; Deborah P. M. Symmons; Alan J. Silma 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 81 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experience treatment failure with one anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) agent, due to either inefficacy or toxicity, are frequently switched to a second anti‐TNF agent, although the benefits of switching are unknown. The pres

Genome-wide association study of genetic
✍ Darren Plant; John Bowes; Catherine Potter; Kimme L. Hyrich; Ann W. Morgan; Anth 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB 👁 1 views

## Objective Anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are successful therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, inadequate response occurs in 30–40% of patients treated. Knowledge of the genetic factors that influence response may facilitate personalized therapy. The purpose of this study