NMR probes for measuring magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems
✍ Scribed by Nicola De Zanche; Christoph Barmet; Jurek A. Nordmeyer-Massner; Klaas P. Pruessmann
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 959 KB
- Volume
- 60
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
High‐resolution magnetic field probes based on pulsed liquid‐state NMR are presented. Static field measurements with an error of 10 nanotesla or less at 3 tesla are readily obtained in 100 ms. The further ability to measure dynamic magnetic fields results from using small (∼1 μL) droplets of MR‐active liquid surrounded by susceptibility‐matched materials. The consequent high field homogeneity allows free induction decay signals lasting 100 ms or more to be readily achieved. The small droplet dimensions allow the magnetic field to be measured even in the presence of large gradients. Highly sensitive detection yields sufficient SNR to follow the relevant field evolution without signal averaging and at bandwidths up to hundreds of kHz. Transient, nonreproducible effects and drifts are thus readily monitored. The typical application of k‐space trajectory mapping has been demonstrated. Potential further applications include characterization, tuning, and maintenance of gradient systems as well as the mapping of the static field distribution of MRI magnets. Connection of the probes to a standard MR spectrometer is similar to that used for imaging coils. Magn Reson Med 60:176–186, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Measuring image encoding fields in real time and applying the information in postprocessing offer improved image quality for MRI, particularly for applications that are intrinsically sensitive to gradient imperfections. For this task, a stand-alone magnetometer system based on multiple 2 H transmit-
## Abstract We examined whether a magnetic field comparable to one of the fields produced during MRI induced steady‐state changes in brain electrical activity while the field was applied (called a presence effect to distinguish it from evoked potentials). The electroencephalogram was measured from