Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up
✍ Scribed by Larson, R A; Hochhaus, A; Hughes, T P; Clark, R E; Etienne, G; Kim, D-W; Flinn, I W; Kurokawa, M; Moiraghi, B; Yu, R; Blakesley, R E; Gallagher, N J; Saglio, G; Kantarjian, H M
- Book ID
- 111898859
- Publisher
- Nature Publishing Group
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 351 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-6924
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The International Randomized study of Interferon‐alpha plus cytarabine (IFN‐α plus ara‐C) versus STI571 (imatinib mesylate) [IRIS trial] in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)‐positive, chronic‐phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has not shown
6/155), high white cell number (13/155) (red cell unit) or low thrombocyte number (14/125) (thrombocyte unit). Summary: Donors with low hemoglobin levels have to be excluded from the blood donation service for 3 months. So, in theory haemoglobin concentration of all total blood units is suitable for
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Nilotinib is a selective, potent BCR‐ABL inhibitor. Previous studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CML‐CP) or accelerated phase who failed prior imatinib. ## METH