The analysis of complex flows around realistic aircraft geometries is becoming more and more predictive. In order to obtain this result, the complexity of flow analysis codes has been constantly increasing, involving more refined fluid models and sophisticated numerical methods. These codes can only run on top computers, exhausting their memory and CPU capabilities. It is, therefore, difficult to introduce best analysis codes in a shape optimization loop: most previous works in the optimum shape design field used only simplified analysis codes. Moreover, as the most popular optimization methods are the gradientbased ones, the more complex the flow solver, the more difficult it is to compute the sensitivity code. However, emerging technologies are contributing to make such an ambitious project, of including a state-of-the-art flow analysis code into an optimisation loop, feasible. Among those technologies, there are three important issues that this paper wishes to address: shape parametrization, automated differentiation and parallel computing. Shape parametrization allows faster optimization by reducing the number of design variable; in this work, it relies on a hierarchical multilevel approach. The sensitivity code can be obtained using automated differentiation. The automated approach is based on software manipulation tools, which allow the differentiation to be quick and the resulting differentiated code to be rather fast and reliable. In addition, the parallel algorithms implemented in this work allow the resulting optimization software to run on increasingly larger geometries.