It has been argued that the problem of medical diagnosis is fundamentally ill-structured, particularly during the early stages when the number of possible explanations for presenting complaints can be immense. This paper discusses the process of clinical hypothesis evocation, contrasts it with the s
New reasoning methods for artificial intelligence in medicine
โ Scribed by Benjamin Kuipers
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1987
- Weight
- 615 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7373
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The discovery and validation of knowledge representations for new types of reasoning is a vital step in artificial intelligence (AI) research. A clear example of this process arises in our recent study of expert physicians' knowledge of the physiological mechanisms of the body. First, we observed that the reliance on weighted associations between findings and hypotheses in first-generation medical expert systems made it impossible for them to express knowledge of disease mechanisms. Second, to obtain empirical constraints on the nature of this knowledge of mechanism in human experts, we collected and analysed verbatim transcripts of expert physicians solving selected clinical problems. This analysis led us to the key aspects of a qualitative representation for the structure and behavior of mechanisms. The third step required a computational study of the problem of inferring behavior from structure, and resulted in a completely specified and implemented knowledge representation and a qualitative simulation algorithm (QSIM). Within this representation, we built a structural description for the mechanism studied in the transcripts, and the simulation produced the same qualitative prediction made by the physicians. Finally, the system is validated in two ways. A mathematical analysis demonstrates the power and limitations of the representation and algorithm as a qualitative abstraction of differential equations. The medical content of the knowledge base is evaluated and refined using the standard knowledge-engineering methodology. We believe that this combination of cognitive, computational, mathematical, and domain knowledge constraints provides a useful paradigm for the development of new knowledge representations in artificial intelligence.
1. Introduction
Research in artificial intelligence (A1) in medicine frequently involves the design and testing of representations for new types of knowledge. In this paper, I will review one line of research at two levels.
(~1) The immediate medical question:
How do expert physicians reason about the mechanism of the body?
(2) The theoretical issues for AI:
How do we discover knowledge representations for new types of reasoning? How do we validate a representation and the knowledge structures built in it?
This paper presents an overview and synthesis of recent research results presented in more detail in
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A set of programs designed to implement artificial-intelligence-related concepts in quantitative electroencephalogram anabsis are described. The programs use rule-based logic with top down parsing (backward chaining) to evaluate EEG data. A simple implementation of fuzzy logic in premise clauses of
Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence by Paul R. Cohen is an unusual text. Cohen advocates the use of statistical methods for analyzing AI programs and interpreting their performance-a view which is more accepted in principle by the AI community than followed in practice. One might expect su