𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

New perspectives on games and interaction

✍ Scribed by Krzysztof R Apt; Robert Van Rooij; Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Colloquium (eds.)


Publisher
Amsterdam Univ. Press
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Leaves
329
Series
Texts in logic and games, v. 4
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


New Perspectives on Games and Interactio
✍ Krzysztof R. Apt, Robert van Rooij, eds. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Amsterdam University Press 🌐 English

In 2007 at the Dutch Royal Academy of Sciences in Amsterdam, a colloquium on new perspectives on games and interaction brought together researchers on games in logic, computer science, linguistics, and economics in order to clarify their uses of game theory and identify promising new directions for

New Perspectives on Goffman in Language
✍ Lorenza Mondada (editor), Anssi PerΓ€kylΓ€ (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

This collection highlights new perspectives on the work of Erving Goffman, revisiting his place in contemporary social theory and interactional linguistics research and its impact in surfacing new insights in conversation analysis and our understanding of Goffman’s legacy. The volume outlines the th

Case, Agreement, and their Interactions:
✍ AndrΓ‘s BΓ‘rΓ‘ny (editor); Laura Kalin (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› De Gruyter 🌐 English

<p> Differential argument marking has been a hot topic in linguistics for several decades, both because it is cross-linguistically widespread and because it raises essential questions at multiple levels of grammar, including the relationship between abstract processes and overt morphological marking

Case, Agreement, and their Interactions:
✍ AndrΓ‘s BΓ‘rΓ‘ny (editor); Laura Kalin (editor) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› De Gruyter 🌐 English

<p> Differential argument marking has been a hot topic in linguistics for several decades, both because it is cross-linguistically widespread and because it raises essential questions at multiple levels of grammar, including the relationship between abstract processes and overt morphological marking