𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study

✍ Scribed by Catherine L. Reed; Shy Shoham; Eric Halgren


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
218 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
1065-9471

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted during which seven subjects carried out naturalistic tactile object recognition (TOR) of real objects. Activation maps, conjunctions across subjects, were compared between tasks involving TOR of common real objects, palpation of “nonsense” objects, and rest. The tactile tasks involved similar motor and sensory stimulation, allowing higher tactile recognition processes to be isolated. Compared to nonsense object palpation, the most prominent activation evoked by TOR was in secondary somatosensory areas in the parietal operculum (SII) and insula, confirming a modality‐specific path for TOR. Prominent activation was also present in medial and lateral secondary motor cortices, but not in primary motor areas, supporting the high level of sensory and motor integration characteristic of object recognition in the tactile modality. Activation in a lateral occipitotemporal area associated previously with visual object recognition may support cross‐modal collateral activation. Finally, activation in medial temporal and prefrontal areas may reflect a common final pathway of modality‐independent object recognition. This study suggests that TOR involves a complex network including parietal and insular somatosensory association cortices, as well as occipitotemporal visual areas, prefrontal, and medial temporal supramodal areas, and medial and lateral secondary motor cortices. It confirms the involvement of somatosensory association areas in the recognition component of TOR, and the existence of a ventrolateral somatosensory pathway for TOR in intact subjects. It challenges the results of previous studies that emphasize the role of visual cortex rather than somatosensory association cortices in higher‐level somatosensory cognition. Hum. Brain Mapping 21:236–246, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI s
✍ Nouchine Hadjikhani; Beatrice de Gelder 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 275 KB

Brain imaging research has identified at least two regions in human extrastriate cortex responding selectively to faces. One of these is located in the mid-fusiform gyrus (FFA), the other in the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG). We studied activation of these areas using fMRI in three individuals with

The supraspinal neural correlate of blad
✍ Ulrich Mehnert; Lars Michels; Monika-Zita Zempleni; Brigitte Schurch; Spyros Kol 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 436 KB

## Abstract In recent years, functional imaging studies have revealed a supraspinal network, which is involved in perception and processing of bladder distention. Very little information exists on the cortical representation of C‐fiber transmitted temperature sensation of the human bladder, althoug

Neural correlates of verbal feedback pro
✍ Ingrid K. Christoffels; Elia Formisano; Niels O. Schiller 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 558 KB

## Abstract Speakers use external auditory feedback to monitor their own speech. Feedback distortion has been found to increase activity in the superior temporal areas. Using fMRI, the present study investigates the neural correlates of processing verbal feedback without distortion. In a blocked de

Neural specificity of acupuncture stimul
✍ Lijun Bai; Hao Yan; Linling Li; Wei Qin; Peng Chen; Peng Liu; Qiyong Gong; Yijun 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 317 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To investigate the neural specificity of pericardium PC6, with the same meridian acupoint PC7 and a treatment‐irrelevant acupoint GB37 as separate controls. ## Materials and Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the whole brain was performed in 36 health

What differs in visual recognition of ha
✍ Marieke Longcamp; Yevhen Hlushchuk; Riitta Hari 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 490 KB

## Abstract In models of letter recognition, handwritten letters are considered as a particular font exemplar, not qualitatively different in their processing from printed letters. Yet, some data suggest that recognizing handwritten letters might rely on distinct processes, possibly related to moto