๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Neopragmatism and Theological Reason (Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies)

โœ Scribed by G.W. Kimura


Publisher
Routledge
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Leaves
176
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Neopragmatism and Theological Reason examines the recent explosion of interest in pragmatism. Part I traces the source of classical pragmatism's distinctive thought to Peirce, James, and Dewey - specifically to their shared theological understanding inherited from Emerson's Transcendentalism and British Romanticism. Part II reconstructs this rationality for postmodernity, showing how neopragmatism, properly understood, is theological reason. Kimura discusses the return of religious themes in philosophers like Putnam, Cavell, and Rorty and critiques the neopragmatic theologies of West, McFague, and Kaufman. Neopragmatism and Theological Reason explores pragmatic themes across philosophy, theology, and literary theory, arguing that neopragmatism must acknowledge its theological sources and then reconstruct its rationality to the religious context of modernity/postmodernity.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Contents
Part I
Introduction: Neopragmatism in Crisis
1 Emerson, Part I
2 Emerson, Part II
3 Peirce
4 James
5 Dewey
Part II
6 Early Neopragmatism
7 Neokantianism and Neopragmatism
8 Literary Neopragmatism
9 Neopragmatism and the Return of Religion
10 Conclusion โ€“ Neopragmatism and Theology
Index
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Neopragmatism and Theological Reason (Ro
โœ G.W. Kimura ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Neopragmatism and Theological Reason examines the recent explosion of interest in pragmatism. Part I traces the source of classical pragmatism's distinctive thought to Peirce, James, and Dewey - specifically to their shared theological understanding inherited from Emerson's Transcendentalism a

Exploring Theological Paradoxes (Routled
โœ Cyril Orji ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2022 ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book focuses on the question of theological paradox, exploring what it means and its place in theological method from a Christian perspective. Just as paradoxes are unavoidable in logic and mathematics, paradoxes are inevitable in religious and theological discourses. The chapters in t

Exploring Theological Paradoxes (Routled
โœ Cyril Orji ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2022 ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book focuses on the question of theological paradox, exploring what it means and its place in theological method from a Christian perspective. Just as paradoxes are unavoidable in logic and mathematics, paradoxes are inevitable in religious and theological discourses. The chapters in t

Theological Fringes of Phenomenology (Ro
โœ Joseph Rivera (editor), Joseph O'Leary (editor) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2023 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book focuses on the relationships between phenomenology and theology, which have been varied and complex but seem currently in an inconclusive and loosely defined state. Methodological rigor is not much in evidence, and the two disciplines continue to defy any authoritative synthesis.

Theological Fringes of Phenomenology (Ro
โœ Joseph Rivera (editor), Joseph O'Leary (editor) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2023 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book focuses on the relationships between phenomenology and theology, which have been varied and complex but seem currently in an inconclusive and loosely defined state. Methodological rigor is not much in evidence, and the two disciplines continue to defy any authoritative synthesis.

Theological Fringes of Phenomenology (Ro
โœ Joseph Rivera (editor), Joseph O'Leary (editor) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2023 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book focuses on the relationships between phenomenology and theology, which have been varied and complex but seem currently in an inconclusive and loosely defined state. Methodological rigor is not much in evidence, and the two disciplines continue to defy any authoritative synthesis.