𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Naive semantics for natural language understanding

✍ Scribed by Kathleen Dahlgren


Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Leaves
270
Series
Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science, SECS 58.; Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science., Natural language processing and machine translation
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Natural Language Understanding in a Sema
✍ Caroline BarriΓ¨re (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2016 πŸ› Springer International Publishing 🌐 English

<p><p>This book serves as a starting point for Semantic Web (SW) students and researchers interested in discovering what Natural Language Processing (NLP) has to offer. NLP can effectively help uncover the large portions of data held as unstructured text in natural language, thus augmenting the real

Boolean Semantics for Natural Language
✍ Edward L. Keenan, Leonard M. Faltz (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>In the spring of 1978, one of the authors of this book was sitting in on a course in logic for linguists given by the other author. In attempting to present some of Montague's insights in an elementary way (hopefully avoidΒ­ ing the notation which many find difficult at first), the authors began d

Boolean semantics for natural language
✍ Edward L. Keenan, Leonard M. Faltz (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>In the spring of 1978, one of the authors of this book was sitting in on a course in logic for linguists given by the other author. In attempting to present some of Montague's insights in an elementary way (hopefully avoidΒ­ ing the notation which many find difficult at first), the authors began d

Boolean Semantics for Natural Language
✍ Edward L. Keenan, Leonard M. Faltz (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>In the spring of 1978, one of the authors of this book was sitting in on a course in logic for linguists given by the other author. In attempting to present some of Montague's insights in an elementary way (hopefully avoidΒ­ ing the notation which many find difficult at first), the authors began d