✦ LIBER ✦

Myocardial damage following coronary air embolism during coronary angiography

✍ Scribed by Amar, Ronnie ;Halon, David A. ;Lewis, Basil S.

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1987
Tongue: English
Weight: 324 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 0098-6569
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810130107

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Coronary air embolism during coronary an

Coronary air embolism during coronary angioplasty

✍ Hadjimiltiades, Stavros ;Goldbaum, Thomas S. ;Mostel, Ed ;Mintz, Gary S. ;Kimbir 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 336 KB 👁 2 views

Detection and quantification of embolic

Detection and quantification of embolic particles during percutaneous coronary intervention to stable plaque: It correlates to coronary flow dynamics and myocardial damage

✍ Atsunori Okamura; Hiroshi Ito; Katsuomi Iwakura; Shigeo Kawano; Toshiya Kurotobi 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 322 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Objectives: We detected embolic particles liberated from plaque during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as high‐intensity transient signals (HITS) with a Doppler guidewire and studied their impact on coronary flow dynamics and the myocardium in patients with stable angina pector

Air embolism in the right coronary arter

Air embolism in the right coronary artery occurring during the left coronary angioplasty using the guiding catheter with a side hole

✍ Teruo Inoue; Isao Yaguchi; Keiichi Mizoguchi; Kazuhiro Hoshi; Kan Takayanagi; Sh 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB 👁 1 views

Impact of contrast agent type (ionic ver

Impact of contrast agent type (ionic versus nonionic) used for coronary angiography on angiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes following thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction

✍ C. Michael Gibson; Ajay J. Kirtane; Sabina A. Murphy; Susan J. Marble; James A. 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 49 KB

## Abstract The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between contrast agent type (ionic vs. nonionic) and angiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Ionic or nonionic contrast agents were selected in a nonrandomized fashion for 90‐min