𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Multielectrode surface EMG for noninvasive estimation of motor unit size

✍ Scribed by Tzyh-Yi Sun; Thy-Sheng Lin; Jia-Jin Chen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
236 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


To noninvasively estimate the motor unit size, we present a novel surface electromyographic (EMG) measurement system consisting of a surface multielectrode with four-pin electrodes and a pair of surface-disk electrodes. Surface motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) were recorded with the multielectrode, in the so-called multielectrode surface EMG (MSEMG), which was spatially filtered to localize the sensing area and reduce the noise. In addition, a modified decomposition algorithm, considering the geometrical configuration of the multielectrode, was designed to identify the individual MUAPs in the measured MSEMG. The identified MUAP was subsequently used as the triggering source for the EMG signals recorded by the surface-disk electrodes. From a pool of 34 subjects with neuromuscular diseases and 14 normal subjects, the median amplitudes of surface-disk EMG after spike-triggered averaging, called MSEMG-MUAP, correlated well (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001) with those of macro EMG. Moreover, the MSEMG-MUAP recording during a ramp force contraction exhibited the common size principle phenomenon during motor unit recruitment. The results of this study demonstrate that the MSEMG-MUAP measurement is a feasible approach for estimating the motor unit size from the skin surface.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Motor unit size estimation of enlarged m
✍ Karin Roeleveld; Arne Sandberg; Erik V. StΓ₯lberg; Dick F. Stegeman πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 261 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Surface EMG is hardly used to estimate motor unit (MU) characteristics, while its non-invasiveness is less stressful for patients and allows multi-electrode recordings to investigate different sites of the muscle and MU. The present study compares motor unit potentials (MUPs) obtained with surface E