๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Multicriterion decision making in irrigation planning

โœ Scribed by K.S Raju; D.N Kumar


Book ID
117496022
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
227 KB
Volume
62
Category
Article
ISSN
0308-521X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fuzzy multicriterion decision making in
โœ K. Srinivasa Raju; D. Nagesh Kumar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 228 KB

## Abstract Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) has emerged as an effective methodology due to its ability to combine quantitative and qualitative criteria for selection of the best alternative. Concurrently, fuzzy logic is gaining importance due to its flexibility in handling imprecise subjectiv

Multicriterion decision making in perfor
โœ Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju; C.R.S. Pillai ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 276 KB

The selection of the best alternative in irrigation development strategies is examined in the multiobjective context. Sri Ram Sagar Project, a major irrigation project in India is taken for the case study. The study deals with the performance evaluation of ยฎve canal distributories by considering eig

Multicriterion decision making in river
โœ Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju; C.R.S. Pillai ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 237 KB

Five Multicriterion Decision Making (MCDM) methods, namely, ELECTRE-2, PROMETHEE-2, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Compromise Programming (CP) and EXPROM-2 are employed to select the best reservoir conยฎguration for the case study of Chaliyar river basin, Kerala, India. Spearman rank correlation c

Ordinal ranking methods for multicriteri
โœ Zachary F. Lansdowne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 980 KB

Given multiple criteria and multiple alternatives, the goal is to aggregate the criteria information and obtain an overall ranking of alternatives. An ordinal ranking method requires only that the rank order of the alternatives be known for each criterion. We compare and illustrate the ordinal ranki