Preface
General Preface for the series Public Economy and Urban Governance in China
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
1.3 Technology Roadmap
2 Related Theory and Literature Review
2.1 Definitions of Related Concepts
2.1.1 Connotation of Sharing Economy
2.1.2 Characteristics of Bilateral Platforms of Sharing Economy
2.1.3 Governance, Supervision and Control Differentiated
2.2 The Development of Sharing Platforms and Urban Construction
2.2.1 Development Model of Typical Urban Sharing Platforms
2.2.2 The Effect of Sharing Platform Development on Urban Construction
2.3 Self-governance of Sharing Economy Platforms
2.3.1 The Evolution of Self-governance Theory
2.3.2 Logical Relationship Between Sharing Economy and the CPRs Theory
2.4 Government Governance of Sharing Economy Platforms
References
3 An Overview of the Development of Sharing Platforms and Urban Construction in China and Other Countries
3.1 Status Quo of Sharing Economy Platforms
3.1.1 An Overview of General Development
3.1.2 Development Status of Urban Ride-Sharing Platform Enterprises
3.1.3 Development Status of Urban Sharing Accommodation Platform Enterprises
3.1.4 Development Status of Urban Office Sharing Platform Enterprises
3.2 The Impact of the Development of Sharing Platforms on Urban Construction
3.2.1 Short-Term Impact of Sharing Platform on Urban Construction
3.2.2 Long-Term Impact of Sharing Platforms on Urban Construction
3.2.3 Mechanism Function of Sharing Platforms on the Construction of Some Tourist Cities
References
4 The Governance Experience of Urban Sharing Economy Platforms in China and Other Countries
4.1 Common Problems in the Governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
4.2 The Governance Experience of Sharing Economy Platforms in Some American Cities
4.2.1 Restrictions on Airbnb Access in New York State
4.2.2 Tax Controls of Airbnb in Los Angeles
4.2.3 Restrictions on Uber Access at Airports in Other Cities
4.2.4 The General Attitude to Governance of the US Government
4.3 The Governance Experience of Some European Cities
4.3.1 Introduction of EU Sharing Economy Guidelines
4.3.2 Incentives for House and Car Sharing in London, UK
4.3.3 Incentives and Restrictions for Car Sharing in Paris, France
4.3.4 The Ban on Uber Access in Rome, Italy
4.3.5 Restrictions on Airbnb Access in Berlin, Germany
4.4 The Governance Experience of Some Asian Cities
4.4.1 Deregulation of Sharing Platforms in Seoul, South Korea
4.4.2 Standardized Governance of House Sharing in Tokyo, Japan
4.4.3 Experience of Governing Airbnb Platform in Hong Kong
References
5 A Study of Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms Based on the CPRs Theory
5.1 Principles of Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
5.1.1 Nested Boundaries of Urban Sharing Platforms
5.1.2 Sharing Platforms to Rely on Local Resource Conditions
5.1.3 Sharing Platforms as the Wisdom of Collective Choice
5.1.4 Effective Self-supervision of Sharing Platforms
5.1.5 Internal and External Sanctions of Sharing Platforms
5.1.6 Sharing Platforms Required to Avoid Internal and External Conflicts in the Industry
5.1.7 The Relatively Independent Organization Rights of Sharing Platforms
5.1.8 Decentralization of Sharing Platforms
5.2 Scope of the Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
5.2.1 Internal Selection Variables Affecting Participants of Sharing Platforms
5.2.2 Advantages of Institutional Supply
5.2.3 Credible Commitment and Mutual Supervision
5.3 Effects of Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
5.3.1 Overcapacity: Aggravation or Mitigation
5.3.2 Negative Externality: Increase or Decrease
5.4 Coordination Between Self-governance and Government Governance
5.4.1 Multi-center Governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
5.4.2 Prior Access Based on Equity and Security
5.4.3 Post-regulation Based on Normative Self-governance
References
6 Multi-dimensional Collaborative Governance of Urban House Sharing Platforms
6.1 Self-governance of Urban Accommodation Sharing Platforms
6.1.1 Contents of the Self-governance of Accommodation Sharing Platforms
6.1.2 Coordination and Conflict Between Shared Accommodation and Urban Public Resources
6.1.3 Defects of Self-governance of Accommodation Sharing Platforms
6.2 Coordination Between Self-governance and Government Governance of Accommodation Sharing Platforms
6.2.1 Collaborative Governance Between the Government and Accommodation Sharing Platform Enterprises
6.2.2 Collaborative Co-governance of Accommodation Sharing by the Government, Platforms and Society
6.3 Self-governance of Urban Office Sharing Platforms
6.3.1 Self-governance Content of the Office Sharing Platform
6.3.2 Coordination and Conflict Between Shared Office and Urban Public Resources
6.3.3 Defects of Self-governance of the Office Sharing Platform
6.4 Collaboration Between Self-governance of Office Sharing Platforms and Government Governance
6.4.1 Collaborative Governance Between the Government and Office Sharing Platforms
6.4.2 Collaborative Governance of Co-working by the Government, Platforms and Society
References
7 Multi-dimensional Collaborative Governance of Urban Ride-Sharing Platforms
7.1 Self-governance of Urban Car-Sharing Platforms
7.1.1 Contents of Self-governance of Urban Car-Sharing Platforms
7.1.2 Coordination and Conflict Between Car-Sharing and Urban Public Resources
7.1.3 Defects of Self-governance of the Car-Sharing Platform
7.1.4 Car Seat Sharing
7.2 Collaboration Between Self-governance of the Car-Sharing Platforms and Government Governance
7.2.1 Collaborative Governance Between the Government and Car-Sharing Platform Enterprises
7.2.2 Collaborative Governance of Car Sharing by the Government, Platforms and Society
7.3 Self-governance of Urban Bike-Sharing Platforms
7.3.1 Contents of Self-governance of Urban Bike-Sharing Platforms
7.3.2 Coordination and Conflict Between Shared Bikes and Urban Public Resources
7.3.3 Defects of Self-governance of Bike-Sharing Platforms
7.4 Collaboration Between the Self-governance Bike-Sharing Platforms and Government Governance
7.4.1 Collaborative Governance Between the Government and Bike-Sharing Platform Enterprises
7.4.2 Collaborative Governance of Shared Bikes by the Government, Platforms, and Society
References
8 The Mechanism of Multi-dimensional Collaborative Governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.1 The Premise of Multi-dimensional Collaborative Governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.1.1 Universal Characteristics of Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.1.2 Common Defects of Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.2 Collaboration Between Self-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms and Government Governance
8.2.1 Building an Access Mechanism for the Sharing Economy Industry Based on Fair Competition and Security
8.2.2 Adjusting Taxes According to Local Conditions
8.2.3 Post-event Management: Punishment and Reward
8.3 Social Co-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.3.1 Improvement and Communication of the Credit Investigation System
8.3.2 Improvement of Sharing Supporting Facilities
8.3.3 Community Co-governance of Urban Sharing Platforms
8.3.4 Reconstruction of Urban Public Space
8.3.5 Establishment of Sharing Platforms of the Urban Agglomeration
References
9 Conclusion and Prospects
Postscript