Multi-criteria evaluation of climate policy interactions
โ Scribed by Konidari, Popi (author);Mavrakis, Dimitrios (author)
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 228 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
- DOI
- 10.1002/mcda.399
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
The effectiveness of a national climate policy instrument is affected by the presence of policy interactions with other instruments that were not forecasted before its implementation. The problem can be confronted during the design of the instrument by determining forms, types and size of emerging interactions. This paper presents a systematic approach for evaluating the aggregate effect of interactions using a combination of three multiโcriteria methods, the analytical hierarchy process, the multiโattribute utility theory and the Simple MultiโAttribute Ranking Technique. The first is used for determining the weight coefficients for interaction forms and subโcriteria. The other two are used for grading policy interactions under a set of three criteria and their subโcriteria. The method is tested for two pairs of interactive instruments, IPPC and EUโETS, EUโETS and policies for the promotion of RES, within the Hellenic climate policy framework. Consistency and robustness tests are performed. Results are commented. Copyright ยฉ 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper presents an integrated multi-criteria analysis method for the quantitative evaluation of climate change mitigation policy instruments. The method consists of: (i) a set of criteria supported by sub-criteria, all of which describe the complex framework under which these instruments are sel
## Abstract The development of the shipping industry has been traditionally based on bank loans. An important step in the credit granting process is the application for the loan and the consequent evaluation of this application by the bank. Numerous bankers, consultants, as well as academics have b
Conventional economic modeling tools that depend upon one criterion to select among possible alternatives for inclusion in an energy or environmental policy have limitations. Formulation of both sets of policies involves large numbers of stakeholders with differing views and preferences. Those views