✦ LIBER ✦

MRI of the equine digit with a dedicated low-field magnet

✍ Scribed by Choquet, P.; Constantinesco, A.; Sick, H.

Book ID: 118018276
Publisher: British Veterinary Association
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 841 KB
Volume: 146
Category: Article
ISSN: 0042-4900
DOI: 10.1136/vr.146.21.616

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

LOW-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF

LOW-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF BEAGLE BRAIN WITH A DEDICATED RECEIVER COIL

✍ Marjatta Snellman; Judit Benczik; Raimo Joensuu; Usama Abo Ramadan; Jukka Tanttu 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 729 KB

Improvement of the Field Homogeneity wit

Improvement of the Field Homogeneity with a Permanent Magnet Assembly for MRI

✍ Sakurai, H.; Aoki, M.; Miyamoto, T. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ⚖ 787 KB

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAGIC ANGLE EFFE

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAGIC ANGLE EFFECT IN THE EQUINE DEEP DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDON USING A LOW-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE SYSTEM

✍ MATHIEU SPRIET; ALEXIA McKNIGHT 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 343 KB

Passive shimming of the fringe field of

Passive shimming of the fringe field of a superconducting magnet for ultra-low field hyperpolarized noble gas MRI

✍ Juan Parra-Robles; Albert R. Cross; Giles E. Santyr 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 362 KB

Tuned HTS SQUID-Detected Low Field MRI U

Tuned HTS SQUID-Detected Low Field MRI Using a Permanent Magnet for Pre-polarization With Automatic Transportation

✍ Chao Liu, ; Yi Zhang, ; Hui Dong, ; Longqing Qiu, ; Krause, H.; Xiaoming Xie, ; 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 834 KB

MRI of the foot and ankle: Diagnostic pe

MRI of the foot and ankle: Diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of a dedicated low field MR scanner

✍ Guido Verhoek; Marco Zanetti; Stefan Duewell; Hans Zollinger; Juerg Hodler 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 691 KB

## Abstract The objective of this study was to compare image quality and patient acceptance of a dedicated .2‐T MR system and a 1.0‐T whole body system. Forty‐one consecutive patients referred for MRI of the foot or ankle were prospectively examined with a dedicated .2‐T low field system and a 1.0‐