𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

MRI for staging lymphoma: Whole-body or less?

✍ Scribed by Thomas C. Kwee; Erik M. Akkerman; Rob Fijnheer; Marie José Kersten; József Zsíros; Inge Ludwig; Marc B. Bierings; Malou A. Vermoolen; Maarten S. van Leeuwen; Jaap Stoker; Rutger A.J. Nievelstein


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
312 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose:

To assess whether whole‐body MRI detects more clinically relevant lesions (i.e., leading to a change in Ann Arbor stage) than an MRI protocol that only includes the head/neck and trunk (i.e., from cranial vertex to groin, excluding the arms) in patients with lymphoma.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred consecutive patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma prospectively underwent T1‐weighted and T2‐weighted short inversion time inversion recovery whole‐body MRI. The number of lymphomatous sites at MRI with a field of view (FOV) limited to the head/neck and trunk, and the additional number of lymphomatous sites at whole‐body MRI and their influence on Ann Arbor stage were determined.

Results:

At MRI with a FOV limited to the head/neck and trunk, 507 sites were classified as lymphomatous. At whole‐body MRI, 7 additional sites outside the head/neck and trunk in 7 patients (7.0%; 95% confidence interval: 3.4–13.8%) were classified as lymphomatous, but Ann Arbor stage never changed.

Conclusion:

Whole‐body MRI did not detect any clinically relevant lesions outside the FOV of an MRI protocol that only includes the head/neck and trunk. Therefore, it may be sufficient to only include the head/neck and trunk when using MRI for staging lymphoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:1144–1150. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Emerging techniques: Whole-body screenin
✍ Thomas C. Lauenstein; Richard C. Semelka 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 605 KB

## Abstract Strategies for screening or tumor staging include various modalities such as plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), MRI, and ultrasound. Technical innovations have created the feasibility to use MRI to image the entire body in a relatively short time‐period. Whole‐body MRI may pla