𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

MRI analysis of in vivo meniscal and tibiofemoral kinematics in ACL-deficient and normal knees

✍ Scribed by Sandra J. Shefelbine; C. Benjamin Ma; Keh-Yang Lee; Mark A. Schrumpf; Priyesh Patel; Marc R. Safran; John P. Slavinsky; Sharmila Majumdar


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
237 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The objectives of this study were to analyze simultaneously meniscal and tibiofemoral kinematics in healthy volunteers and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)‐deficient patients under axial load‐bearing conditions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ten healthy volunteers and eight ACL‐deficient patients were examined with a high‐field, closed MRI system. For each group, both knees were imaged at full extension and partial flexion (∼45°) with a 125N compressive load applied to the foot. Anteroposterior and medial/lateral femoral and meniscal translations were analyzed following three‐dimensional, landmark‐matching registration. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities were less than 0.8 mm for femoral translation for image processing and data analysis. The position of the femur relative to the tibia in the ACL‐deficient knee was 2.6 mm posterior to that of the contralateral, normal knee at extension. During flexion from 0° to 45°, the femur in ACL‐deficient knees translated 4.3 mm anteriorly, whereas no significant translation occurred in uninjured knees. The contact area centroid on the tibia in ACL‐deficient knees at extension was posterior to that of uninjured knees. Consequently, significantly less posterior translation of the contact centroid occurred in the medial tibial condyle in ACL‐deficient knees during flexion. Meniscal translation, however, was nearly the same in both groups. Axial load‐bearing MRI is a noninvasive and reproducible method for evaluating tibiofemoral and meniscal kinematics. The results demonstrated that ACL deficiency led to significant changes in bone kinematics, but negligible changes in the movement of the menisci. These results help explain the increased risk of meniscal tears and osteoarthritis in chronic ACL deficient knees. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of kinematic analysis by mapp
✍ Jennifer M Scarvell; Paul N Smith; Kathryn M Refshauge; Howard R Galloway; Kevin 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 706 KB

## Abstract Two methods of analysis of knee kinematics from magnetic resonance images (MRI) in vivo have been developed independently: mapping the tibiofemoral contact, and tracking the femoral condylar centre. These two methods are compared for the assessment of kinematics in the healthy and the a

In vivo kinematics and kinetics of a bi-
✍ Fabio Catani; Andrea Ensini; Claudio Belvedere; Alessandro Feliciangeli; Maria G 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 221 KB

## Abstract After total knee arthroplasty, changes in articular surface geometry, soft tissue treatment, and component alignment can alter normal lower limb function. The guided motion bi‐cruciate substituting prosthesis was designed specifically to restore physiological knee joint motion. We deter