๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Motor evoked potentials in a mouse model of chronic multiple sclerosis

โœ Scribed by Stefano Amadio; Stefano Pluchino; Elena Brini; Paolo Morana; Roberta Guerriero; Filippo Martinelli Boneschi; Giancarlo Comi; Paola Zaratin; Valeria Muzio; Ubaldo Del Carro


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
153 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

We tested cortical motor evoked potentials (cMEPs) as a quantitative marker for in vivo monitoring of corticospinal tract damage in a murine multiple sclerosis model (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, EAE). The cMEPs, previously standardized in naive C57BL/6 developing and adult mice, were studied longitudinally in adult EAE mice. Central conduction times (CCTs) increased significantly shortly before the earliest clinical signs developed (10 days postimmunization, dpi), with peak delay in acute EAE (20โ€“40 dpi). In clinically stable disease (80 dpi), CCTs did not increase further, but cMEP amplitude declined progressively, with complete loss in >80% of mice at 120 dpi. Increase in CCT correlated with presence of inflammatory infiltrates and demyelination in acute EAE, whereas small or absent cMEPs were associated with continuing axonal damage in clinicallyโ€stabilized disease and beyond (>80 dpi). These results demonstrate that cMEPs are a useful method for monitoring corticospinal tract function in chronicโ€progressive EAE, and provide insight into the pathological substrate of the condition. Muscle Nerve, 2006


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Frequency-dependent conduction delay of
โœ Jรธrgen FeldbรฆK Nielsen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 201 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied in 33 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and in 21 healthy controls. A major abnormality was found in latency of the second motor-evoked potential in MS patients. At interstimulus intervals of 75, 100, and 150 ms the central motor conduction time (C