✦ LIBER ✦

Morphology of the induction process after implantation of bone matrix into mice

✍ Scribed by M. V. Raevskaya

Publisher: Springer US
Year: 1981
Tongue: English
Weight: 811 KB
Volume: 91
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-4888
DOI: 10.1007/bf00835342

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Conditions affecting induction of osteog

Conditions affecting induction of osteogenesis after implantation of bone matrix into mice

✍ M. V. Raevskaya 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 688 KB

The induction of alkaline phosphatase by

The induction of alkaline phosphatase by extraskeletal implants of bone matrix

✍ H. E. Firschein; Marshall R. Urist 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 333 KB

Inhibition of the inductive activity of

Inhibition of the inductive activity of demineralized bone matrix by different percutaneous implants

✍ G. Uretzky; J. Appelbaum; J. Sela 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 897 KB

The relationship between metabolic statu

The relationship between metabolic status and endochondral calcification in the process of bone development following decalcified bone matrix implantation

✍ Hajime Toba; Saburou Kakuta; Tsunahiro Nakamura; Hidehiko Matsumoto; Osamu Ohshi 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 470 KB

Morphological and biophysical investigat

Morphological and biophysical investigation of the auditory cortex after electrode implantation into the inner ear in cats

✍ I. V. Rakhmanova; A. G. Maksina; B. A. Dainyak; Yu. A. Loshchilov 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 674 KB

The effect of glass-ceramic implants on

The effect of glass-ceramic implants on matrix vesicle calcification after two weeks of rat tibial bone healing

✍ Müller-Mai, C. ;Amir, D. ;Wendland, H. ;Schwartz, Z. ;Sela, J. ;Gross, U. 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 891 KB

## Abstract Type, size and distribution of extracellular matrix vesicles (MV), known mediators of primary calcification, were studied around bone‐bonding and metal‐oxide containing, nonbonding, glass‐ceramic implants. This was performed in order to further understand the different effects of implan