๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Morphological differences between fast and slowly adapting lingual afferent terminations in the principal and oral nuclei in the cat

โœ Scribed by Moritani, Masayuki; Yoshida, Atsushi; Honma, Shiho; Nagase, Yoshitaka; Takemura, Motohide; Shigenaga, Yoshio


Book ID
101220569
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
387 KB
Volume
396
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9967

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Previous studies indicated that fast-adapting (FA) and slowly adapting (SA) mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the facial or intraoral structures give rise to morphologically distinct terminal arbors in the individual subdivisions of the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex. The present study examined the collateral morphologies of lingual afferents in the nuclei principalis (Vp) and oralis (Vo) of the cat. Seven FA and six SA lingual afferents were physiologically characterized and stained by the intra-axonal horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injection technique. The two types of afferents established terminal arbors in the dorsomedial subdivision (Vpd) of the Vp, and the rostrodorsomedial (Vo.r) and dorsomedial subdivisions (Vo.dm) of the Vo, but the collateral morphologies are different between the two types. The FA afferents gave rise to mediolaterally extended oblong arbors in each subdivision, but the arbors were better developed in the Vo.r than in the Vpd and Vo.dm. The number of collaterals, intercollateral distance, number of boutons per collateral, and bouton size were also different among the subdivisions. The SA afferents were divided into two subtypes; one had a preferential projection into the Vpd or the Vo.r and Vo.dm, and others lacked a selected projection. Although the shape of their arbors varied from a stringy form to a roundish form, the general profile was denser, better developed, and rounder than that of FA afferents in each subdivision. The intercollateral distance and bouton size were different among the subdivisions. The number of boutons per collateral, bouton density, and bouton size were larger in SA than FA afferents in each subdivision. The present study demonstrated that two functionally distinct lingual afferents manifest unique morphological differences in the Vpd and Vo.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES