๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity

โœ Scribed by Gilbert Harman, Judith Thomson


Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Leaves
235
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Do moral questions have objective answers? In this great debate, Gilbert Harman explains and argues for relativism, emotivism, and moral scepticism. In his view, moral disagreements are like disagreements about what to pay for a house; there are no correct answers ahead of time, except in relation to one or another moral framework.

Independently, Judith Jarvis Thomson examines what she takes to be the case against moral objectivity, and rejects it; she argues that it is possible to find out the correct answers to some moral questions. In her view, some moral disagreements are like disagreements about whether the house has a ghost.

Harman and Thomson then reply to each other. This important, lively accessible exchange will be invaluable to all students of moral theory and meta-ethics.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


God, Modality, and Morality
โœ William E. Mann ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2015 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Suppose that God exists: what difference would that make to the world? The answer depends on the nature of God and the nature of the world. In this book, William E. Mann argues in one new and sixteen previously published essays for a modern interpretation of a traditional conception of God as a simp

Morality, Mortality: Volume II: Rights,
โœ F. M. Kamm ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

In this second volume, Kamm continues to explore questions of life and death as illustrations of general issues in moral theory. Resuming her development of non- consequentialist ethical theory and its application to practical ethical problems, she explores the distinction between killing and lettin

Morality, Mortality, Volume II: Rights,
โœ Frances Myrna Kamm ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press on Demand ๐ŸŒ English

Kamm applies her non-consequentialist theory to practical ethical problems involving life and death, including the distinction between killing and letting die, and the permissibility of harming some to save others.

Moral Relativism
โœ Lukes, Steven ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2013;2011 ๐Ÿ› Picador ๐ŸŒ English

Moral relativism attracts and repels. What is defensible in it and what is to be rejected' Do we as human beings have no shared standards by which we can understand one another' Can we abstain from judging one another's practices' Do we truly have divergent views about what constitutes good and evil