𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Moral Equality, Bioethics, and the Child

✍ Scribed by Claudia Wiesemann (auth.)


Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Year
2016
Tongue
English
Leaves
156
Series
International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 67
Edition
1
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Presenting real life cases from clinical practice, this book claims that children can be conceived of as moral equals without ignoring the fact that they still are children and in need of strong family relationships. Drawing upon recent advances in childhood studies and its key feature, the β€˜agentic child’, it uncovers the ideology of adultism which has seeped into much what has been written about childhood ethics. However, this book also critically examines those positions that do accord moral equality to children but on grounds not strong enough to support their claim. It lays the groundwork for a theory of moral equality by assessing the concepts of parenthood, family, best interest, paternalism, and, above all, autonomy and trust which are so important in envisioning what we owe the child. It does not only show how children – like adults – should be considered moral agents from infancy but also how ethical theories addressing adults can significantly profit from recognizing this. The analysis takes into account contributions from European as well as American scholars and makes use of a wide range of ethical, psychological, cultural, and social-scientific research.

✦ Table of Contents


Front Matter....Pages i-ix
Front Matter....Pages 1-1
Introduction....Pages 3-19
The Debate About Moral Equality....Pages 21-41
Front Matter....Pages 43-43
Natality....Pages 45-58
Trust....Pages 59-71
Family....Pages 73-86
Autonomy....Pages 87-102
Front Matter....Pages 103-103
The Dialectic of Trust and Autonomy....Pages 105-129
Basic Concepts for Clinical Practice....Pages 131-151
Back Matter....Pages 153-155

✦ Subjects


Ethics;Pediatrics


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bioethics and the Fetus: Medical, Moral
✍ James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder (auth.), James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder ( πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Humana Press 🌐 English

Who has more rights-the mother or the fetus?<BR><BR> Interdisciplinary in scope and character, this latest volume of Humana's classic series, Biomedical Ethics Reviews, focuses on the complex moral and legal problems involving human fetal life.<BR> Each article in Bioethics and the Fetus provides an

Moral Realities: Mormonism, Medicine, an
✍ Courtney S Campbell πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2021 πŸ› Oxford University Press, USA 🌐 English

<em>Mormonism, Medicine, and Bioethics </em>provides the first comprehensive treatment of principles and positions on questions of bioethics encountered by members, professionals, and ecclesiastical leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS or Mormon). The book addresses three

Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dile
✍ Michael L. Gross πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› The MIT Press 🌐 English

This is an excellent coverage of the issues that we are facing in the conflict with Asysmetric war from an Israeli perspective. Unforunately, there are no easy answers or quick formulas that can be converted into nice presentable sound-bytes. What role does medical staff play and what are the trade-

The Elimination of Morality: Reflections
✍ Anne Maclean πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

<EM>The Elimination of Morality</EM> combines a criticism of utilitarianism with an argument for the futility of bioethics. Anne Maclean challenges the conception of reason in ethics central to both, and argues that a philosophical training confers no special authority to make pronouncements on mora

Uncertain Bioethics: Moral Risk and Huma
✍ Stephen Napier πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

<p></p> <p>Bioethics is a field of inquiry and as such is fundamentally an epistemic discipline. Knowing how we make moral judgments can bring into relief why certain arguments on various bioethical issues appear plausible to one side and obviously false to the other. <i>Uncertain Bioethics </i>make