## Abstract Each year approximately 40,000 people in the United States and 500,000 people worldwide are diagnosed with head‐and‐neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC). Although there have been significant improvements in the treatment of this disease, leading to decreased morbidity, over the past few
Molecular signatures of metastasis in head and neck cancer
✍ Scribed by Stefano Colella; Kristy L. Richards; Linda L. Bachinski; Keith A. Baggerly; Spiridon Tsavachidis; James C. Lang; David E. Schuller; Ralf Krahe
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 373 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background.
Metastases are the primary cause of cancer treatment failure and death, yet metastatic mechanisms remain incompletely understood.
Methods.
We studied the molecular basis of head and neck cancer metastasis by transcriptionally profiling 70 samples from 27 patients—matching normal adjacent tissue, primary tumor, and cervical lymph node metastases.
Results.
We identified tumor‐associated expression signatures common to both primary tumors and metastases. Use of matching metastases revealed an additional 46 dysregulated genes associated solely with head and neck cancer metastasis. However, despite being metastasis‐specific in our sample set, these 46 genes are concordant with genes previously discovered in primary tumors that metastasized.
Conclusions.
Although our data and related studies show that most of the metastatic potential appears to be inherent to the primary tumor, they are also consistent with the notion that a limited number of additional clonal changes are necessary to yield the final metastatic cell(s), albeit in a variable temporal order. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 2008
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background. Lymphatic metastasis represents the single most important clinical prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but underlying genetic mechanisms remain ill defined. Genetic differences between primary carcinomas and their corresponding metastases
Initial cancer evaluation includes assessment of histologic appearance, tumor grading, assessment of lymph node status, and presence of metastasis. However, traditional diagnostic methods such as histopathology and radiology are not sensitive enough to detect small numbers of cancer cells and are li
## Background: Two competing concepts, field cancerization and micrometastatic lesions, have been postulated to account for the high frequency of second primary tumors and multicentric dysplasia in patients with head and neck carcinoma. ## Methods: To provide insight into this process, the author
## Background: The recognition of risk factors for the development of distant metastasis is necessary for identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from systemic therapy. previous investigations studying possible risk factors have been heterogeneous, with patients having varied forms of therap