Molecular classification of living organisms
β Scribed by C. Saccone; C. Gissi; C. Lanave; G. Pesole
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 669 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-2844
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Recent studies in molecular evolution have generated strong conflicts in opinion as to how world living organisms should be classified. The traditional classification of life into five kingdoms has been challenged by the molecular analysis carried out mostly on rRNA sequences, which supported the division of the extant living organisms into three major groups: Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, and Eukaryota. As to the problem of placing the root of the tree of life, the analysis carried out on a few genes has provided discrepant results. In order to measure the genetic distances between species, we have carried out an evolutionary analysis of the glutamine synthetase genes, which previously have been revealed to be good molecular clocks, and of the small and large rRNA genes. All data demonstrate that archaebacteria are more closely related to eubacteria than to eukaryota, thus supporting the classical division of living organisms into two main superldngdoms, Prokaryota and Eukaryota.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Above are placed, side by side, the new scale~ the Birmingham\* scale and the Darling, Brown & Sharpe scale, the values being given in fractions of an inch. By comparison of the first two scales it will be seen that for the old series of four sizes from 0000 to 0 is substituted a series of seven si
A list of the genera of living organisms known or believed to contain luminous species is provided in the Appendix, in a systematic context. The constraints on the accuracy of such a list and some aspects of the apparent distribution of bioluminescence are discussed.