๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Molecular and morphological evaluation of doubled haploid lines in maize. 1. Homogeneity within DH lines

โœ Scribed by A. Murigneux; D. Barloy; P. Leroy; M. Beckert


Publisher
Springer
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
890 KB
Volume
86
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-5752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The homogeneity of anther culture-derived lines of maize has been evaluated by means of field observations and molecular markers. The homogeneity of the doubled haploid (DH) lines was shown by the absence of segregation for morphological oligogenic traits. The intravariance for polygenic traits for 42 DH and two conventionally derived lines was similar, which confirmed the homozygosity of the DH lines. More than 100 RFLP markers were tested on 189 DH lines derived from two crosses, DH5 x DH7 and A188 x DH7, and 60 single-seed descent (SSD, F6) lines derived from A188 x DH7. The overall rate of heterozygosity for all of the DH lines was approximatively 1% and pertained to 6 lines out of 189, while it was 8.5% for the SSD lines after four selfings. A precise description of the material used suggested that the events which led to this unexpected heterozygozity in DH lines were more likely to have occurred after rather than during the androgenetic process. Nine duplicated pairs of genotypes were found within the DH lines, indicating that a single microspore-derived structure can fragment to give two identical plantlets. Despite the extensive screening with more than 100 markers, only 2 lines showed unexpected banding profiles, and these were probably gametoclonal variants. The use of a direct regeneration system that avoids any callus phase might explain this low frequency of gametoclonal variation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Molecular and morphological evaluation o
โœ A. Murigneux; S. Baud; M. Beckert ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 893 KB

Doubled-haploid (DH) and single-seed-descent (SSD) lines in maize have been compared for quantitatively inherited traits and for RFLP markers. The comparisons of the distributions for agromorphological traits do not allow definite conclusions to be drawn on the similarity of the two reproductive sys