𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Modules, kinds, and homology

✍ Scribed by Olivier Rieppel


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
91 KB
Volume
304B
Category
Article
ISSN
1552-5007

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Developmental modules are best conceptualized as homeostatic property cluster natural kinds. As is true in other fields of biology, an individual may instantiate properties of various natural kinds. Through their dissociability, developmental modules can be recruited to function as evolutionary modules. The proper analogy to developmental modules, atoms, or biological species depends on the scope over which specific developmental modules allow generalizations. The nature of the relationship between developmental modules, evolutionary modules, and taxic (phylogenetic) homology are explored. Similarity of gene expression patterns and developmental pathways as captured by biological homology may support hypotheses of taxic homology, but not the other way around. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol). 304B:000–000, 2005. Β© 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Crossed modules and homology
✍ M. Ladra; A. R.-GrandjeΓ‘n πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 942 KB
Varieties of modules: Kinds, levels, ori
✍ Winther, Rasmus G. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 116 KB

## Abstract This article began as a review of a conference, organized by Gerhard Schlosser, entitled β€œModularity in Development and Evolution.” The conference was held at, and sponsored by, the Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg in Delmenhorst, Germany in May, 2000. The article subsequently metamorphosed in

Molecules, Developmental Modules, and Ph
✍ Alessandro Minelli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 80 KB

Most traditional views of homology rely on two unwarranted premises: the pervasively hierarchical nature of biology, inclusive of the levels of genes, development, and morphology and the linear mapping of genes onto developmental schedules and of developmental schedules onto phenotypes. These premis