✦ LIBER ✦

Modulation of intravenous cocaine effects by chronic oral cocaine in humans

✍ Scribed by Sharon L. Walsh; Kathleen A. Haberny; George E. Bigelow

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 158 KB
Volume: 150
Category: Article
ISSN: 0033-3158
DOI: 10.1007/s002130000439

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Physiological, subjective and reinforcin

Physiological, subjective and reinforcing effects of oral and intravenous cocaine in humans

✍ Brandi J. Smith; Hendree E. Jones; Roland R. Griffiths 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 136 KB

Comparison of intravenous cocaethylene a

Comparison of intravenous cocaethylene and cocaine in humans

✍ C. L. Hart; P. Jatlow; K. A. Sevarino; E. F. McCance-Katz 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

Kinetics of cocaine in humans after intr

Kinetics of cocaine in humans after intravenous and intranasal administration

✍ J. I. Javaid; Mahmoud N. Musa; Marian Fischman; C. R. Schuster; John M. Davis 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 416 KB 👁 2 views

Effects of nifedipine pretreatment on su

Effects of nifedipine pretreatment on subjective and cardiovascular responses to intravenous cocaine in humans

✍ Carles Muntaner; Karen M. Kumor; Craig Nagoshi; Jerome H. Jaffe 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 780 KB

Effect of intravenous injection speed on

Effect of intravenous injection speed on responses to cocaine and hydromorphone in humans

✍ Mary E. Abreu; George E. Bigelow; Lee Fleisher; Sharon L. Walsh 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB

Behavioral effects of chronically admini

Behavioral effects of chronically administered cocaine in squirrel monkeys

✍ Leonard L. Howell; W. H. Morse 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 603 KB

Cocaine (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg/h) was infused continuously from osmotic minipumps during 14-day periods in three squirrel monkeys trained under a fixed-interval schedule of stimulus-shock termination. Chronic exposure to 0.1 mg/kg/h cocaine increased response rates during control sessions for two subject