Modulation of insulin-like growth factor actions in L6A1 myoblasts by insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5: A dual role for IGFBP-5

✍ Scribed by Daina Z. Ewton; Sharon A. Coolican; Subburaman Mohan; Steven D. Chernausek; James R. Florini

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1998
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 213 KB
• Volume: 177
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0021-9541
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(199810)177:1<47::aid-jcp5>3.0.co;2-e

✦ Synopsis

We have previously shown that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells in culture, and that these actions in L6A1 muscle cells may be modulated by three secreted IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), IGFBP-4, -5, and -6. Since we found that the temporal expression pattern of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 differed dramatically during the transition from proliferating myoblasts to differentiated myotubes, we undertook the current study to examine the effects of purified IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on IGFstimulated actions in L6A1 muscle cells. As has been shown for other cell types, we found that IGFBP-4 had only inhibitory actions, inhibiting IGF-I and IGF-IIstimulated proliferation and differentiation. In contrast, IGFBP-5 exhibited both inhibitory and stimulatory actions. When added in the presence of 30 ng/ml IGF-I, IGFBP-5 (250 ng/ml) inhibited all markers of the early proliferative response: the tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic signaling molecules IRS-1 and Shc, the activation of the MAP kinases, ERK1 and 2, the elevation of c-fos mRNA, the early inhibition of the elevation in myogenin mRNA, and the increase in cell number. In contrast, IGFBP-5 stimulated all aspects of the myogenic response to IGF-I: the later rise in myogenin mRNA, the elevation of creatine kinase activity, and the fusion of myoblasts into myotubes. This dual response to IGFBP-5 was greatest when it was added at a molar ratio of IGFBP-5 to IGF-I of 2:1. In contrast, when IGFBP-5 was added in the presence of IGF-II, it inhibited both proliferation and differentiation. Neither IGFBP had any effect when added in the presence of R3 IGF-I, an analog with substantially reduced affinity for IGFBPs. Our results suggest that the role of IGFBP-4 is mainly to sequester excess IGFs, and thus inhibit all actions. IGFBP-5, however, is capable of eliciting a dual response, possibly due to its unique ability to associate with the cell membrane.