This communication examines the findings from a survey of fire tests carried out in New Zealand. The survey compares the quoted Fire Resistance Ratings with the times at which the structures actually failed for different failure criteria. In particular, the differences between insulation and integri
Modeling thermal fire resistance
โ Scribed by Edward M. Krokosky
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1971
- Weight
- 969 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0007-3628
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Computer-aided procedures have been developed to allow architects and engineers with no previous computer knowledge to prediet the theoretical fire ratings of different layers of fireproofing materials. The device which permits such a theoretical evaluation is a computer model known as FIRE (Fire Intensity-Resistance Evaluation). Using this procedure a engineer can choose up to three different layers of material to be evaluated under various fire intensities. The layers which can contain water or different transformation products can be considered to be in intimate contact or separated by an air gap. The various layers can be considered to be attached to a heat sink which represents the mass of various structural members of different sizes.
A direetory offifty materials is available for evaluation under.fire exposures of different intensities and durations. Correlations are now being carried out with existing fire tests to insure the best fit for the different temperaturedependent material parameters that are required. THECOTRANS (LOOP) THECOTEM (LOOP) HAS LOOP, M thermal conductivity after transformation thermal conductivity temperature factor heat-sink-surface heat transfer coefficient into the sink material layer
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES