Modality: A History (Oxford Philosophical Concepts)
โ Scribed by Yitzhak Y. Melamed (editor), Samuel Newlands (editor)
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Year
- 2024
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 361
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Modality: A History provides readers a sweeping study of the history of philosophical work on modal concepts. Everyday discourse is saturated with appeals to what might be the case or to what must be true or to what cannot happen. Possibility, necessity, and impossibility are modal terms, and philosophers have long wondered how to best understand them. This volume traces the history of some of the most prominent and important contributions to our understanding of possibility and necessity over the past two and half millennia of western philosophy, from ancient Greek philosophers through current debates in the 21st century.
Over the course of nine chapters from prominent scholars, this volume traces a history of modal theorizing that begins with extended discussions of Aristotle and the Stoics. Several chapters discuss insights and disagreements among Latin, Arabic, and Jewish medieval scholastics, such as Al-Ghazรยขlรยฎ, Scotus, and Crescas. Three chapters center on early modern philosophers, whose modal views were deeply shaped by this conceptual inheritance but also departed from it in significant ways: Descartes, Malebranche, Locke, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Hume. Kant and Hegel's modal contributions are presented in their own chapter, and another chapter traces the legacy of Kant's account on early-to-mid 20th century modal views, including Husserl, Heidegger, Russell, and Quine.
The revival of modal metaphysics in the more recent work of Kripke, Marcus, and Lewis has led to a new flourishing of modal theories, including in recent debates among neo-Aristotelians, as the final chapter illustrates. Although modal concepts are interesting and important on their own, theories of modality often intersect with other significant philosophical topics, such as time, freedom, and God. Modal concepts also extend beyond metaphysics. To illustrate the role of modality in other domains, several small-scale studies, or Reflections, are dispersed among these main chapters on modality in cosmology, religion, music, literature, and logic. Readers will learn how a seemingly timeless and changeless cluster of modal concepts have undergone significant revisions and enjoy a rich developmental history.
โฆ Table of Contents
Cover
Series
Modality
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
Series Editorโs Foreword
Acknowledgments
List of Contributors
Introduction
1 Aristotle on Modality
2 Modality in Medieval Latin Philosophy
Reflection: Necessity in the Cosmology of Tommaso Campanella
3 Modality and Essence in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes, Malebranche, and Locke
4 Crescas and Spinoza on Modality
5 Leibniz on Modality
Reflection: The Infinity of Worlds in Modern Kabbalah
6 Hume on Modal Discourse
7 Modality in Kant and Hegel
Reflection: Music and Modality
8 Modality in 20th-โCentury Philosophy
Reflection: Vacuism and the Strangeness of Impossibility
9 Modality and Essence in Contemporary Metaphysics
Reflection: Clarice LispectorโโWriting of Necessity
Bibliography
Index
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>Why does a wine glass break when you drop it, whereas a steel goblet does not? The answer may seem obvious: glass, unlike steel, is fragile. This is an explanation in terms of a power or disposition: the glass breaks because it possesses a particular power, namely fragility. Seemingly simple,
<span>Why does a wine glass break when you drop it, whereas a steel goblet does not? The answer may seem obvious: glass, unlike steel, is fragile. This is an explanation in terms of a power or disposition: the glass breaks because it possesses a particular power, namely fragility. Seemingly simple,
<span>In recent decades, memory has become one of the major concepts and a dominant topic in philosophy, sociology, politics, history, science, cultural studies, literary theory, and the discussions of trauma and the Holocaust. In contemporary debates, the concept of memory is often used rather broa
<span>Recurrent questions about space have dogged philosophers since ancient times. Can an ordinary person draw from his or her perceptions to say what space is? Or is it rather a technical concept that is only within the grasp of experts? Can geometry characterize the world in which we live? What i