## Abstract Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) or styrene–ethylene/1‐butene–styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with a commercial mixture of polystyrene (PS) and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) were prepared in the melt at different temperatures according to the chemical kind of
Miscibility study on polyphenylene oxide and SBS triblock copolymer blends
✍ Scribed by Hsien-Tang Chiu; Dao-Shinn Hwung
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 413 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0014-3057
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
This paper discusses the relationship between the miscibility and physical properties of poly(2,6-dimethyl-l,4-phenylene oxide, PPO) and polystyrene (PS), high impact polystyrene (IPS) and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), which are blended into different compositions by the twin screw. The three types of SBS that we used are SBS1, SBS2 and SBS3 and have different styrene/butadiene ratios. We used DMA (dynamic mechanical analysis) and DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) to study their miscibility. The miscibility of these blends decreases with the decrease in PS content. The notch sensitivity is improved by blending.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Conducting polymer blends based on styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) triblock copolymer and polyaniline doped with dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid (Pani.DBSA) were prepared by different procedures: mechanical mixing (MM) and ‘in situ’ polymerization (ISP) methods. The ISP blends exhibited hi
## Abstract **Summary:** The crack propagation kinetics of binary styrene‐(styrene/butadiene)‐styrene triblock copolymer blends based on one with symmetrical (LN4) and another with asymmetrical (LN3) molecular architecture is discussed with respect to post‐yield crack‐tip blunting and stable crack
## Abstract Surface modification of a segmented polyurethane was achieved by blending with novel PEO‐containing amphiphilic triblock copolymers (PEO‐polyurethane‐PEO). Three copolymers having different PEO MW (550, 2000, 5000) were used as surface modification additives. The protein resistance of t