The meaning of nonzero set points for the identifiability of the ARMAX model parameters in a closed-loop system with a minimum-variance controller is explained and discussed. It is pointed out that, in the case of a zero set point and an ARMAX model resulting from the discretization of a continuous-
Minimum variance in fast, slow and dual-rate control loops
✍ Scribed by Xiaorui Wang; Liqian Zhang; Tongwen Chen; Biao Huang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 228 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0890-6327
- DOI
- 10.1002/acs.865
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In certain industrial applications, the control updating rate is faster than the output sampling rate by a certain factor, which leads to dual‐rate (DR) control problems. Generally speaking, a DR controller performs better than a slow single rate (SSR) controller but worse than a fast single rate (FSR) controller in the sense of minimum variance control. This conjecture is theoretically justified in this paper for a continuous linear time‐invariant (LTI) single‐input single‐output (SISO) system. The optimal FSR, DR and SSR controllers are designed under the same performance criterion: variance of the fast sampled output. The discretization of continuous stochastic disturbance models is investigated preserving certain basic statistical properties. A linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach is developed to calculate the optimal controllers for DR and SSR loops. The theoretical results are illustrated by two simulation examples. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES