For batchwise radical chain solution polymerization, the minimum end time problem is studied by considering the initiator concentration (or feed rate) and temperature as two control variables. The kinetic model used is based on a general mechanism and involving the gel effect. It is found that the o
Minimum end-time policies for batchwise radical chain polymerization: the piecewise initiator addition policy
โ Scribed by Keh-Ying Hsu; Show-an Chen
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 940 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
For the radical chain polymerization in a presence of chain transfer agent, piecewise initiator addition and piecewise reaction temperature are considered as two control actions in XV unequal time intervals for minimizing the total reaction time under a given final monomer conversion and the number average chain length. It is found that only one of the two actions are needed to be choosen in the bulk or solution polymerization without chain transfer agent. The initiator addition control is found to be better than the temperature control at the expense of lower polydispersity. The optimal policy of the piecewise initiator addition under the best isothermal temperature is that which gives the highest possible reaction temperature and the least possible total amount of initiator charged just enough for the polymerization to reach the predetermined number average chain length and conversion. With this policy, equal amount of the initiator should be charged into the reactor at every equal time interval. Experimental verifications for solution polymerization of styrene with or without chain transfer agent show that the present method is applicable.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
For styrene polymenzatlon, a two-stage process IS consldered The first stage, nntlated by mltlator, IS operated along the best rsothermal policy for a predetermined number average molecular weight and monomer conversion at end of the stage as described m the previous paper The second stage IS operat