𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Minimalism vs Contextualism in Semantics


Category
Fiction

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Discourse contextualism : a framework fo
✍ Silk, Alex πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2016 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

Alex Silk investigates the role of context in the meaning and use of natural language. His text provides a systematic account of the distinctive ways in which speakers use context-sensitive expressions to coordinate their attitudes and negotiate about how the context should evolve.</div> <br> Abstr

Austere Realism: Contextual Semantics Me
✍ Terence Horgan, MatjaΓ‚Βž Potrč πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› The MIT Press 🌐 English

The authors of Austere Realism describe and defend a provocative ontological- cum -semantic position, asserting that the right ontology is minimal or austere, in that it excludes numerous commonsense posits, and that statements employing such posits are nonetheless true, when truth is understood t

Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimal
✍ Gerhard Preyer, Georg Peter πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2007 🌐 English

Fifteen specially written papers examine the ways in which the content of what we say is dependent on the context in which we say it. At the centre of the current debate on this subject is Cappelen and Lepore's claim that context-sensitivity in language is best captured by a combination of semantic

Minimal Semantics
✍ Emma Borg πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Oxford University Press, USA 🌐 English

<em>Minimal Semantics</em> asks what a theory of literal linguistic meaning is <em>for</em>--if you were to be given a working theory of meaning for a language right now, what would you be able to do with it? Emma Borg sets out to defend a formal approach to semantic theorizing from a relatively ne

Minimal Semantics
✍ Emma Borg πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› Clarendon Press 🌐 English

Minimal Semantics asks what a theory of literal linguistic meaning is for--if you were to be given a working theory of meaning for a language right now, what would you be able to do with it? Emma Borg sets out to defend a formal approach to semantic theorizing from a relatively new type of opponent